Memory Forensics: Stuxnet -> Volatility Analysis

Sourcehttps://www.computersecuritystudent.com/FORENSICS/VOLATILITY/VOLATILITY2_2/lesson2/

Basic Stuxnet Description (sophisticated APT worm-like trojan):

  1. A normal Windows XP installation has just one instance of lsass.exe that the Winlogon process creates when the system boots. (Wininit creates it on Windows Vista and higher).
  2. Process tree reveals that the two new lsass.exe instances were both created by services.exe, the Service Control Manager, which implies that Stuxnet somehow got its code into the Services.exe process.
  3. Mrxnet.sys is the driver that implements the rootkit that hides files, and Mrxcls.sys is a second Stuxnet driver file that launches the malware when the system boots. 
2. vol.py  imageinfo=WinXPSP3x86 -f stuxnet.vmem

Analyze Stuxnet Process Tree3. vol.py pstree –profile=WinXPSP3x86 -f stuxnet.vmem | egrep ‘(services.exe|lsass.exe|winlogon.exe)’ | tee pstree.txt
Note 1: What is lsass.exe?

  • LSASS, or local security authority subsystem service, is a process that functions as part of the Microsoft Windows operating system.
    • LSASS is part of the process for maintaining and enforcing the security protocols on the operating system.
    • LSASS performs several important functions
      1. To ensure that the system remains free from unauthorized access
      2. LSASS oversees access to a computer or server.
      3. LSASS recognizes any restrictions on access to any information on the hard drive or the server.
      4. LSASS makes sure that only recognized access codes or other login credentials will allow persons to interact with password protected files, directories, etc.

Note 2: Normal Parent-Child Relation vs. Student Parent-

Child one

    • The normal Parent-Child relation
      • winlogon.exe (624) kicks off, DATE: 2010-10-29 17:08:54
        • services.exe (668), DATE: 2010-10-29 17:08:54
        • lsass.exe (680), 2010-10-29 17:08:54
    • The Stuxnet Parent-Child relation
      • services.exe(668) is NOT supposed to, but kicks off
        • lsass.exe (1928), DATE: 2011-06-03 04:26:55
        • lsass.exe (868), DATE: 2011-06-03 04:26:55
      • Notice these two lsass.exe processes were created 216 after winlogin.exe was started.

 Note 3: Lsass

  • Another way that you can tell the good lsass.exe (680) processes from the bad (1928 & 868) lsass.exe process is that PID 680 are bound to Port 500 and 4500, while PIDs 1928 & 868 are not.


Analyze Sockets
4. vol.py sockets –profile=WinXPSP3x86 -fstuxnet.vmem | egrep ‘(Off|—|680|1928|868)’ | tee images/sockets.txt

Analyze DLLs

  • Analyze lsass DLLs​
  1. ./vol.py dlllist -p 680 –profile=WinXPSP3x86 -f stuxnet.vmem 2>/dev/null | wc -l
  2. ./vol.py dlllist -p 1928 –profile=WinXPSP3x86 -f stuxnet.vmem 2>/dev/null | wc -l
  3. ./vol.py dlllist -p 868 –profile=WinXPSP3x86 -f stuxnet.vmem 2>/dev/null | wc -l
  4. ./vol.py dlllist -p 680,1928,868 –profile=WinXPSP3x86 -f stuxnet.vmem > dlllist.txt
  5. ls -l dlllist.txt


Note 4: Lsass DLLsAnother suspicious characteristic of the two superfluous processes is the fact that they have very few DLLs loaded. 
DLLs are automatically added … when a process call the LoadLibrary.
Notice that the good PID (680) has 64 DLLs attached to its’ process.
Notice that the bad PID (1928) has 35 DLLs attached to its’ process.
Notice that the bad PID (868) has 15 DLLs attached to its’ process.

Analyze Process IDs with malfind

vol.py malfind -p 680 –profile=WinXPSP3x86 -f images/stuxnet/stuxnet.vmem
vol.py malfind -p 868 –profile=WinXPSP3x86 -f images/stuxnet/stuxnet.vmem
vol.py malfind -p 868,1928 –profile=WinXPSP3x86 -f images/stuxnet/stuxnet.vmem > images/stuxnet/output/malfind.txt

Note:

  • The malfind command has several purposes. You can use it to find hidden or injected code/DLLs in user mode memory, based on characteristics such as VAD tag and page permissions. 
  • Services.exe, Lsass.exe or Explorer.exe should not have write permission. 
  • Notice, that PID(680) did not return any results, while PID (868 and 1928) did.


Bypassing Behavior Blocking When Loading DLLs

1. What is Address space layout randomization (ASLR)
Address space layout randomization (ASLR) is a computer security method which involves randomly arranging the positions of key data areas, usually including the base of the executable and position of libraries, heap, and stack, in a process’s address space.

2. Bypassing Behavior Blocking When Loading DLLs
Whenever Stuxnet needs to load a DLL, including itself, it uses a special method designed to bypass behavior-blocking and host intrusion-protection based technologies that monitor LoadLibrary calls. Stuxnet calls LoadLibrary with a specially crafted file name that does not exist on disk and normally causes LoadLibrary to fail. However, W32.Stuxnet has hooked Ntdll.dll to monitor for requests to load specially crafted file names. These specially crafted filenames are mapped to another location instead a location specified by W32.Stuxnet. That location is generally an area in memory where a .dll file has been decrypted and stored by the threat previously. The filenames used have the pattern of KERNEL32.DLL.ASLR.[HEXADECIMAL] or SHELL32.DLL.ASLR. [HEXADECIMAL], where the variable [HEXADECIMAL] is a hexadecimal value.

vol.py dlllist –profile=WinXPSP3x86 -f stuxnet.vmem | grep ASLR
vol.py dlllist –profile=WinXPSP3x86 -f stuxnet.vmem | grep ASLR > aslr.txt
ls -l images/stuxnet/output/aslr.txt

​Displays the Stuxnet specially crafted files designed to bypass the ASRL.

Using ldrmodules to find hidden DLLs


Note (FYI):

There are many ways to hide a DLL. One of the ways involves unlinking the DLL from one (or all) of the linked lists in the PEB (Process Environment Block). However, when this is done, there is still information contained within the VAD (Virtual Address Descriptor) which identifies the base address of the DLL and its full path on disk. To cross-reference this information (known as memory mapped files) with the 3 PEB lists, use the ldrmodules command. For each memory mapped Portable Executable (PE) file, the ldrmodules command prints a 0 or a 1 if the PE exists in the PEB lists.

a. vol.py ldrmodules -p 680 –profile=WinXPSP3x86 -f images/stuxnet/stuxnet.vmem
This is normal

b. vol.py ldrmodules -p 868 –profile=WinXPSP3x86 -f images/stuxnet/stuxnet.vmem

Notice the lines identified by the word “Problem.”c. vol.py ldrmodules -p 1928 –profile=WinXPSP3x86 -f images/stuxnet/stuxnet.vmem | egrep ‘(Pid|-$)’

​Note (FYI):
The lines identified as a problem are either suspicious because an entry is missing from one of the PEB (Process Environment Block) lists or because the path name is blank.

Using procexedump to dump process executables
Note (FYI):

  • To dump a process’s executable (not including the slack space), use the procexedump command.

  1. vol.py procdump -p 680,868,1928 -D ./output/ –profile=WinXPSP3x86 -f stuxnet.vmem
  2. ls -l output/*.exe


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: